← Directory

Bloom

Active

bloom.chayn.co/

Image-based abuseIntimate partner violenceSexual violenceTech-facilitated GBV
Report an issue
Safety score89% — Very good

Audience

survivors

Countries

worldwide

Regions

global

Languages

Arabic, German, Portuguese, Hindi, English, French, Spanish, Turkish

About this tool

Creators

Funding sources

Tool type

GBV issues

Last review

Not yet reviewed

Endorsement

Yes

Bloom screenshot 1

Bloom is a free, safe online support platform created by the survivor-run nonprofit Chayn to help people heal from gender-based violence, sexual trauma, and abusive relationships. It includes library, self-paced courses, grounding exercises, and 1-to-1 messaging.

✓ Endorsed

Bloom is one of the most extensive and well researched resources on GBV. It's been co-created with survivors and in line with the trauma-informed design principles. It's user-friendly and regularly audited/upgraded.

✓ Best fit for

Women* and girls* looking for low-barrier information and resources on GBV, in particular on healing and mental health

✕ Not ideal for

Not yet recorded.

Safety criteria— by category, in rubric order

Privacy & data · 20% of score

93% · 7/8 rated
  • Core content accessible without creating an account— Yes
  • No PII collected by default (name, email, IP, location)— Yes
  • Privacy policy in plain language with a short summary— Yes
  • User data not sold or shared with third parties— Yes
  • Option to use pseudonym or alternative name— Partially
  • No auto-save of form content (shared device risk)— Yes
  • Opt-in (not opt-out) consent — granular and revocable— N/A
  • End-to-end encryption used where applicable— Yes

Safety by design · 20% of score

100% · 2/6 rated
  • Quick-exit button present (redirects discreetly to neutral page)— Yes
  • Content warnings before sensitive or triggering content— N/A
  • Disguised notifications or discreet app icon option— N/A
  • No "people you may know" feature that could expose users to abusers— N/A
  • Two-factor authentication available— Yes
  • Safe alternative contact options supported (distinct from personal accounts)Not assessed— Not assessed

Agency, consent & participatory design · 15% of score

100% · 6/7 rated
  • User controls what information is public vs. private— N/A
  • Multiple content formats available (video, text, audio)— Yes
  • Self-paced use possible — no forced sequential flows— Yes
  • User can opt out of tracking and cookies— Yes
  • Survivors co-designed AND co-iterated — not consulted once only— Yes
  • Tool does not force a single pathway (e.g. 'call police' only)— Yes
  • Feedback mechanism exists for users to flag issues or suggest content— Yes

Accessibility, equity & inclusion · 15% of score

83% · 9/9 rated
  • Available in more than one language— Yes
  • Free to use — no paywall for core content— Yes
  • Mobile-friendly / responsive design— Yes
  • WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance documented— No
  • Gender-neutral, non-stigmatising language throughout— Yes
  • Covers intersectional forms of GBV — not single-issue only— Yes
  • Works on low bandwidth / poor connectivity— Partially
  • Not geographically restricted in access— Yes
  • Mitigates risks for users on shared or monitored devices— Yes

Transparency & accountability · 10% of score

60% · 5/6 rated
  • Creator / organisation clearly identified on the tool— Yes
  • Last update date visible (signals active maintenance)— No
  • Scope and limitations clearly stated — including what the tool cannot do— Yes
  • Funding sources disclosed— Yes
  • Methodology publicly documented— No
  • Content aligned with global GBV/HP standards and reviewedNot assessed— Not assessed

Tone & trauma-informed UX · 10% of score

100% · 5/5 rated
  • No graphic or violent imagery — no sensationalised depictions of violence— Yes
  • Uses "survivor" rather than "victim" language throughout— Yes
  • Warm, non-judgmental, validating tone throughout the interface— Yes
  • Visuals are empowering and gender-diverse — not stereotyping— Yes
  • Does not minimise or hierarchise different forms of abuse— Yes

AI & algorithmic ethics · 5% of score

N/A · 0/5 rated
  • Clearly states if and how AI is used in the tool— N/A
  • Clearly states what AI is usedNot assessed— Not assessed
  • Provides details of how user's inputs are processed/ saved/ shared with third parties.Not assessed— Not assessed
  • Chatbots / automated tools clearly identify themselves as non-human— N/A
  • Human escalation pathway available when AI cannot safely respond— N/A

Sustainability & feminist tech ethos · 5% of score

50% · 2/3 rated
  • Led or co-led by women, gender-diverse people, or Global Majority organisations— Yes
  • Openly licensed — can be used, remixed or adapted by others— No
  • Clearly states compliance with feminist values or trauma-informed design or survivor-centred approachNot assessed— Not assessed

See the Transparency page for how the weighted score and bands are calculated.