Lizzy is an AI-assisted app that gives police officers and social workers a real-time risk profile and evidence-based action plan in seconds.
✕ Not endorsed
We don't endorse this tool because the scope is not clear. What information has to be provided in order to output what risk factors?
✓ Best fit for
Social workers and their organizations working with multiple cases.
✕ Not ideal for
Not yet recorded.
Safety criteria— by category, in rubric order
Privacy & data · 20% of score
40% · 5/8 rated
- ✕Core content accessible without creating an account— No
- ~No PII collected by default (name, email, IP, location)— Partially
- ✓Privacy policy in plain language with a short summary— Yes
- ~User data not sold or shared with third parties— Partially
- ✕Option to use pseudonym or alternative name— No
- —No auto-save of form content (shared device risk)— N/A
- —Opt-in (not opt-out) consent — granular and revocable— N/A
- —End-to-end encryption used where applicable— N/A
Safety by design · 20% of score
33% · 3/6 rated
- ✕Quick-exit button present (redirects discreetly to neutral page)— No
- ✕Content warnings before sensitive or triggering content— No
- —Disguised notifications or discreet app icon option— N/A
- —No "people you may know" feature that could expose users to abusers— N/A
- ✓Two-factor authentication available— Yes
- —Safe alternative contact options supported (distinct from personal accounts)Not assessed— Not assessed
Agency, consent & participatory design · 15% of score
0% · 1/7 rated
- —User controls what information is public vs. private— N/A
- —Multiple content formats available (video, text, audio)— N/A
- —Self-paced use possible — no forced sequential flows— N/A
- ✕User can opt out of tracking and cookies— No
- —Survivors co-designed AND co-iterated — not consulted once only— N/A
- —Tool does not force a single pathway (e.g. 'call police' only)— N/A
- —Feedback mechanism exists for users to flag issues or suggest content— N/A
Accessibility, equity & inclusion · 15% of score
86% · 7/9 rated
- ✓Available in more than one language— Yes
- ✕Free to use — no paywall for core content— No
- ✓Mobile-friendly / responsive design— Yes
- —WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance documented— N/A
- ✓Gender-neutral, non-stigmatising language throughout— Yes
- ✓Covers intersectional forms of GBV — not single-issue only— Yes
- ✓Works on low bandwidth / poor connectivity— Yes
- ✓Not geographically restricted in access— Yes
- —Mitigates risks for users on shared or monitored devices— N/A
Transparency & accountability · 10% of score
40% · 5/6 rated
- ✓Creator / organisation clearly identified on the tool— Yes
- ~Last update date visible (signals active maintenance)— Partially
- ✕Scope and limitations clearly stated — including what the tool cannot do— No
- ✕Funding sources disclosed— No
- ~Methodology publicly documented— Partially
- —Content aligned with global GBV/HP standards and reviewedNot assessed— Not assessed
Tone & trauma-informed UX · 10% of score
100% · 5/5 rated
- ✓No graphic or violent imagery — no sensationalised depictions of violence— Yes
- ✓Uses "survivor" rather than "victim" language throughout— Yes
- ✓Warm, non-judgmental, validating tone throughout the interface— Yes
- ✓Visuals are empowering and gender-diverse — not stereotyping— Yes
- ✓Does not minimise or hierarchise different forms of abuse— Yes
AI & algorithmic ethics · 5% of score
100% · 1/5 rated
- ✓Clearly states if and how AI is used in the tool— Yes
- —Clearly states what AI is usedNot assessed— Not assessed
- —Provides details of how user's inputs are processed/ saved/ shared with third parties.Not assessed— Not assessed
- —Chatbots / automated tools clearly identify themselves as non-human— N/A
- —Human escalation pathway available when AI cannot safely respond— N/A
Sustainability & feminist tech ethos · 5% of score
50% · 2/3 rated
- ✓Led or co-led by women, gender-diverse people, or Global Majority organisations— Yes
- ✕Openly licensed — can be used, remixed or adapted by others— No
- —Clearly states compliance with feminist values or trauma-informed design or survivor-centred approachNot assessed— Not assessed
See the Transparency page for how the weighted score and bands are calculated.