UK charity working with sex workers to do research, design and deliver safety tools like reporting incidents, taking down content, sending alerts and check ups on clients.
✕ Not endorsed
It was difficult to evaluate this as all services are behind authentication and there is no information about how they work individually.
✓ Best fit for
Sex workers in the UK
✕ Not ideal for
Not yet recorded.
Safety criteria— by category, in rubric order
Privacy & data · 20% of score
67% · 6/8 rated
✕Core content accessible without creating an account— No
~No PII collected by default (name, email, IP, location)— Partially
✓Privacy policy in plain language with a short summary— Yes
✓User data not sold or shared with third parties— Yes
✓Option to use pseudonym or alternative name— Yes
—No auto-save of form content (shared device risk)— N/A
~Opt-in (not opt-out) consent — granular and revocable— Partially
—End-to-end encryption used where applicable— N/A
Safety by design · 20% of score
33% · 3/6 rated
✕Quick-exit button present (redirects discreetly to neutral page)— No
✕Content warnings before sensitive or triggering content— No
—Disguised notifications or discreet app icon option— N/A
—No "people you may know" feature that could expose users to abusers— N/A
✓Two-factor authentication available— Yes
—Safe alternative contact options supported (distinct from personal accounts)Not assessed— Not assessed
Agency, consent & participatory design · 15% of score
63% · 4/7 rated
~User controls what information is public vs. private— Partially
—Multiple content formats available (video, text, audio)— N/A
—Self-paced use possible — no forced sequential flows— N/A
~User can opt out of tracking and cookies— Partially
✓Survivors co-designed AND co-iterated — not consulted once only— Yes
~Tool does not force a single pathway (e.g. 'call police' only)— Partially
—Feedback mechanism exists for users to flag issues or suggest content— N/A
Accessibility, equity & inclusion · 15% of score
63% · 8/9 rated
✕Available in more than one language— No
✓Free to use — no paywall for core content— Yes
✓Mobile-friendly / responsive design— Yes
✕WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance documented— No
✓Gender-neutral, non-stigmatising language throughout— Yes
✓Covers intersectional forms of GBV — not single-issue only— Yes
✓Works on low bandwidth / poor connectivity— Yes
✕Not geographically restricted in access— No
—Mitigates risks for users on shared or monitored devices— N/A
Transparency & accountability · 10% of score
60% · 5/6 rated
✓Creator / organisation clearly identified on the tool— Yes
✕Last update date visible (signals active maintenance)— No
✓Scope and limitations clearly stated — including what the tool cannot do— Yes
✓Funding sources disclosed— Yes
✕Methodology publicly documented— No
—Content aligned with global GBV/HP standards and reviewedNot assessed— Not assessed
Tone & trauma-informed UX · 10% of score
100% · 5/5 rated
✓No graphic or violent imagery — no sensationalised depictions of violence— Yes
✓Uses "survivor" rather than "victim" language throughout— Yes
✓Warm, non-judgmental, validating tone throughout the interface— Yes
✓Visuals are empowering and gender-diverse — not stereotyping— Yes
✓Does not minimise or hierarchise different forms of abuse— Yes
AI & algorithmic ethics · 5% of score
N/A · 0/5 rated
—Clearly states if and how AI is used in the tool— N/A
—Clearly states what AI is usedNot assessed— Not assessed
—Provides details of how user's inputs are processed/ saved/ shared with third parties.Not assessed— Not assessed
—Chatbots / automated tools clearly identify themselves as non-human— N/A
—Human escalation pathway available when AI cannot safely respond— N/A
Sustainability & feminist tech ethos · 5% of score
50% · 2/3 rated
✓Led or co-led by women, gender-diverse people, or Global Majority organisations— Yes
✕Openly licensed — can be used, remixed or adapted by others— No
—Clearly states compliance with feminist values or trauma-informed design or survivor-centred approachNot assessed— Not assessed
See the Transparency page for how the weighted score and bands are calculated.